Deleuze and the Passions / edited by Ceciel Meiborg & Sjoerd van Tuinen.

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Book collections on Project MUSEPublisher: Earth, Milky Way : punctum books, 2016Manufacturer: Baltimore, Md. : Project MUSE, 2020Copyright date: ©2016Description: 1 online resource (182 pages): illustrationsContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780998237541
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Online resources:
Contents:
Introduction / Ceciel Meiborg & Sjoerd van Tuinen -- "Everywhere There Are Sad Passions": Gilles Deleuze and the Unhappy Consciousness / Moritz Gansen -- To Have Done with the Judgment of 'Reason': Deleuze's Aesthetic Ontology / Samantha Bankston -- Closed Vessels and Signs: Jealousy as a Passion for Reality / Arjen Kleinherenbrink -- The Drama of Ressentiment: the Philosopher versus the Priest / Sjoerd van Tuinen -- The Affective Economy: Producing and Consuming Affects in Deleuze and Guattari / Jason Read -- Deleuze's Transformation of the Ideology-Critique Project: Noology Critique / Benoit Dillet -- Passion, Cinema and the Old Materialism / Louis-Georges Schwartz -- Death of Deleuze, Birth of Passion / David U.B. Liu.
Summary: In recent years the humanities, social sciences and neuroscience have witnessed an 'affective turn,' especially in discourses around post-Fordist labor, economic and ecological crises, populism and identity politics, mental health, and political struggle. This new awareness would be unthinkable without the pioneering work of Gilles Deleuze, who replaced judgment with affect as the very material movement of thought: every concept is an affective experience, a becoming. Besides entirely active affects, the highest practice of thought, there is no thought without passive affects or passions. Instead of a calm and rational philosophy of passions, Deleuzian thought is therefore inseparable from "isolated and passionate cries" that deny what everybody knows and what nobody can deny: "every true thought is an aggression." This inseparability of reason and passion is by no means an anti-intellectualist or irrationalist stance. Rather, it is critical, since it protects reason from its self-imposed stupidity (bêtise) by relating it to the unthought forces that condition it. And it is clinical, because thought becomes possessed by a power of selection. The purely active, i.e. free-floating, unrecorded desire, is never enough to produce a consistent relation to the future, which is why we need the passions to give us an initial orientation, to force and enable us to think. Passions are the beliefs, perceptions, representations, and opinions that attach us to the world; they make up the very material of which our lives and thoughts are composed.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Introduction / Ceciel Meiborg & Sjoerd van Tuinen -- "Everywhere There Are Sad Passions": Gilles Deleuze and the Unhappy Consciousness / Moritz Gansen -- To Have Done with the Judgment of 'Reason': Deleuze's Aesthetic Ontology / Samantha Bankston -- Closed Vessels and Signs: Jealousy as a Passion for Reality / Arjen Kleinherenbrink -- The Drama of Ressentiment: the Philosopher versus the Priest / Sjoerd van Tuinen -- The Affective Economy: Producing and Consuming Affects in Deleuze and Guattari / Jason Read -- Deleuze's Transformation of the Ideology-Critique Project: Noology Critique / Benoit Dillet -- Passion, Cinema and the Old Materialism / Louis-Georges Schwartz -- Death of Deleuze, Birth of Passion / David U.B. Liu.

Open Access Unrestricted online access star

In recent years the humanities, social sciences and neuroscience have witnessed an 'affective turn,' especially in discourses around post-Fordist labor, economic and ecological crises, populism and identity politics, mental health, and political struggle. This new awareness would be unthinkable without the pioneering work of Gilles Deleuze, who replaced judgment with affect as the very material movement of thought: every concept is an affective experience, a becoming. Besides entirely active affects, the highest practice of thought, there is no thought without passive affects or passions. Instead of a calm and rational philosophy of passions, Deleuzian thought is therefore inseparable from "isolated and passionate cries" that deny what everybody knows and what nobody can deny: "every true thought is an aggression." This inseparability of reason and passion is by no means an anti-intellectualist or irrationalist stance. Rather, it is critical, since it protects reason from its self-imposed stupidity (bêtise) by relating it to the unthought forces that condition it. And it is clinical, because thought becomes possessed by a power of selection. The purely active, i.e. free-floating, unrecorded desire, is never enough to produce a consistent relation to the future, which is why we need the passions to give us an initial orientation, to force and enable us to think. Passions are the beliefs, perceptions, representations, and opinions that attach us to the world; they make up the very material of which our lives and thoughts are composed.

Description based on print version record.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.