000			03397nam a22005175i 4500
001			978-3-319-42505-4
003			DE-He213
005			20180131132533.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			160728s2016 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783319425054 _9978-3-319-42505-4
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-319-42505-4 _2doi
050		4	_aKJ-KKZ4999
072		7	_aLB _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAW051000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a341.2422 _223
100	1		_aCarrera, Sergio. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aImplementation of EU Readmission Agreements _h[electronic resource] : _bIdentity Determination Dilemmas and the Blurring of Rights / _cby Sergio Carrera.
264		1	_aCham : _bSpringer International Publishing : _bImprint: Springer, _c2016.
300			_aXVII, 83 p. 4 illus., 3 illus. in color. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aSpringerBriefs in Law, _x2192-855X
506	0		_aOpen Access
520			_aBy examining the implementation dynamics of EU Readmission Agreements (EURAs), this book addresses the practical reasons why irregular immigrants cannot be expelled. EURAs are one of the vital legal instruments framing EU external migration law with regard to the expulsion of irregular immigrants, yet their implementation has met with various obstacles. Above all, the process of determining an individual’s legal identity has proven to be one of the most controversial aspects in the implementation of EURAs. The analysis shows that the process of identifying who is whose national in the context of readmission creates two existential dilemmas: first from the perspective of the sovereignty of third countries of origin and the legal standards laid out in international instruments as regards states’ powers in determining nationality, and second regarding the agency of the individual as a holder of fundamental human rights. How do the EURAs deal with or aim at alleviating these identity determination dilemmas? The book provides a comparative analysis of the administrative procedures and rules envisaged by EURAs aimed at proving or presuming the nationality of the persons to be readmitted to their country of origin. It focuses on the ways in which nationality is to be determined or presumed in the scope of the 2010 EURA with Pakistan, and compares it with those foreseen in the EURAs with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cape Verde, Georgia, and Turkey. As such, the book provides a unique and up-to-date study of EURAs and their implementation challenges in the broader context of EU external migration law and policy.
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aEuropean Union.
650		0	_aHuman rights.
650		0	_aInternational humanitarian law.
650		0	_aInternational law.
650		0	_aEmigration and immigration.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aEuropean Law.
650	2	4	_aHuman Rights.
650	2	4	_aMigration.
650	2	4	_aEuropean Union Politics.
650	2	4	_aInternational Humanitarian Law, Law of Armed Conflict.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319425047
830		0	_aSpringerBriefs in Law, _x2192-855X
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42505-4
912			_aZDB-2-LCR
999			_c188966 _d188966