000			03450cam a22005654a 4500
001			musev2_10323
003			MdBmJHUP
005			20240815120723.0
006			m o d
007			cr||||||||nn|n
008			120507s2011 miu o 00 0 eng d
010			_z 2020715328
020			_a9780472900794
020			_z9780472027750
020			_z9780472117932
035			_a(OCoLC)761220805
040			_aMdBmJHUP _cMdBmJHUP
100	1		_aSlapin, Jonathan B., _d1979-
245	1	0	_aVeto Power : _bInstitutional Design in the European Union / _cJonathan B. Slapin.
264		1	_aAnn Arbor : _bUniversity of Michigan Press, _c[2011]
264		3	_aBaltimore, Md. : _bProject MUSE, _c2012
264		4	_c©[2011]
300			_a1 online resource (192 pages).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aNew comparative politics
505	0		_aInstitutional design at IGCs -- Case selection -- Modeling institutionalism and intergovernmentalism -- Testing institutionalism and intergovernmentalism -- Winners and losers at Amsterdam -- Council votes and commissioners -- Exit threats, veto rights, and integration -- British accession : exit options and veto power.
506	0		_aOpen Access _fUnrestricted online access _2star
520			_aVeto rights can be a meaningful source of power only when leaving an organization is extremely unlikely. For example, small European states have periodically wielded their veto privileges to override the preferences of their larger, more economically and militarily powerful neighbors when negotiating European Union treaties, which require the unanimous consent of all EU members. Jonathan B. Slapin traces the historical development of the veto privilege in the EU and how a veto--or veto threat--has been employed in treaty negotiations of the past two decades. As he explains, the importance of veto power in treaty negotiations is one of the features that distinguishes the EU from other international organizations in which exit and expulsion threats play a greater role. At the same time, the prominence of veto power means that bargaining in the EU looks more like bargaining in a federal system. Slapin's findings have significant ramifications for the study of international negotiations, the design of international organizations, and European integration.
546			_aIn English.
588			_aDescription based on print version record.
610	2	7	_aEuropean Union. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00916630
610	2	0	_aEuropean Union.
651		7	_aEuropean Union countries. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01269470
651		0	_aEuropean Union countries _xPolitics and government.
650		7	_aPolitics and government _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01919741
650		7	_aLegislative veto. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00995826
650		7	_aHISTORY _zEurope _xGeneral. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aLAW _xInternational. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aHISTORY _zEurope _vGeneral. _2bisacsh
650		6	_aVeto legislatif _zPays de l'Union europeenne.
650		0	_aLegislative veto _zEuropean Union countries.
655		7	_aElectronic books. _2local
710	2		_aProject Muse. _edistributor
830		0	_aBook collections on Project MUSE.
856	4	0	_zFull text available: _uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/book/10323/
945			_aProject MUSE - 2011 Complete
945			_aProject MUSE - 2011 Political Science and Policy Studies
999			_c230802 _d230801