000 | 03000cam a22005294a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | musev2_47544 | ||
003 | MdBmJHUP | ||
005 | 20240815120743.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr||||||||nn|n | ||
008 | 160209s2016 miu o 00 0 eng d | ||
010 | _z 2020707300 | ||
020 | _a9780472122158 | ||
020 | _z9780472902347 | ||
020 | _z0472130021 | ||
020 | _z9780472130023 | ||
020 | _z0472122150 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)956541684 | ||
040 |
_aMdBmJHUP _cMdBmJHUP |
||
100 | 1 |
_aEdlin, Douglas E., _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCommon Law Judging : _bSubjectivity, Impartiality, and the Making of Law / _cDouglas E. Edlin. |
264 | 1 |
_aAnn Arbor : _bUniversity of Michigan Press, _c[2016] |
|
264 | 3 |
_aBaltimore, Md. : _bProject MUSE, _c2016 |
|
264 | 4 | _c©[2016] | |
300 | _a1 online resource (312 pages). | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction -- Subjectivity, objectivity, impartiality -- Subjectivity and intersubjectivity -- Making law -- Judicial individualism and judicial independence -- Conclusion. | |
506 | 0 |
_aOpen Access _fUnrestricted online access _2star |
|
520 | _aAre judges supposed to be objective? Citizens, scholars, and legal professionals commonly assume that subjectivity and objectivity are opposites, with the corollary that subjectivity is a vice and objectivity is a virtue. These assumptions underlie passionate debates over adherence to original intent and judicial activism. Douglas Edlin challenges these widely held assumptions by reorienting the entire discussion. Rather than analyze judging in terms of objectivity and truth, he argues that we should instead approach the role of a judge's individual perspective in terms of intersubjectivity and validity. Drawing upon Kantian aesthetic theory as well as case law, legal theory, and constitutional theory, Edlin develops a new conceptual framework for the respective roles of the individual judge and of the judiciary as an institution, as well as the relationship between them, as integral parts of the broader legal and political community. | ||
588 | _aDescription based on print version record. | ||
650 | 7 |
_aJudicial process. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00984705 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aCommon law. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00869795 |
|
650 | 7 |
_aPolitical Science / American Government / Judicial Branch. _2bisacsh |
|
650 | 6 |
_aProcessus judiciaire _zAnglophonie. |
|
650 | 6 | _aCommon law. | |
650 | 0 |
_aJudicial process _zEnglish-speaking countries. |
|
650 | 0 | _aCommon law. | |
651 | 7 |
_aEnglish-speaking countries. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01261775 |
|
655 | 7 |
_aElectronic books. _2local |
|
710 | 2 |
_aProject Muse. _edistributor |
|
830 | 0 | _aBook collections on Project MUSE. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_zFull text available: _uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/book/47544/ |
945 | _aProject MUSE - 2016 Complete | ||
945 | _aProject MUSE - 2016 Political Science and Policy Studies | ||
999 |
_c231779 _d231778 |